What AI can't do for your user research
AI tools are great at summarising interviews. They are bad at noticing what people didn't say.
- Written by
- Sofia Ricci
- Published
- 14 August 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min read
I use AI tools in research every week. They transcribe interviews, cluster notes and draft summaries faster than I ever could. But after two years of using them on real projects, I’ve learned where to stop trusting them.
Good at patterns, bad at silence
A model will tell you that six out of eight people mentioned price. It won’t tell you that nobody mentioned the onboarding, even though that’s where everyone got stuck in the session. Noticing absence is still your job.
Summaries flatten tone
“The user found the flow confusing” could mean a mild shrug or a person close to giving up. The transcript has the words but not the pause before them. Always go back to the recording for the moments that matter.
A workflow that holds up
Let the tool do the first pass: transcripts, tags, a rough cluster. Then read the raw notes yourself and look for what’s missing. We walk through this exact workflow in AI in your design workflow, with real interview material.
Keep reading.
· 2 min read
Auto layout is a shelf, not a spreadsheet
The mental model that finally makes Figma's auto layout click, and why it makes handoff easier too.
Ingrid Halvorsen
· 1 min read
Naming design tokens so they last
A token called blue-500 breaks the day the brand changes. Name tokens for what they do, not what they look like.
Anders Lindqvist
· 2 min read
Why we teach Astro before React
Most beginners don't need a JavaScript framework. They need a page on the internet, and Astro gets them there faster.
Marco Bellini